# Alpine JS or Interactivity API with Tailwind CSS. Which one to choose?

**URL:** <https://community.kinsta.com/t/alpine-js-or-interactivity-api-with-tailwind-css-which-one-to-choose/3448>\
**Category:** Questions\
**Created:** [May 22, 2024, 7:04pm UTC](https://community.kinsta.com/t/alpine-js-or-interactivity-api-with-tailwind-css-which-one-to-choose/3448 "2024-05-22T19:04:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sergey\_Gabrielyan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.kinsta.com/sergey_gabrielyan/32/3303_2.png) [@Sergey\_Gabrielyan](https://community.kinsta.com/u/Sergey_Gabrielyan)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2024, 7:04pm UTC](https://community.kinsta.com/t/alpine-js-or-interactivity-api-with-tailwind-css-which-one-to-choose/3448/1 "2024-05-22T19:04:44Z")

</div>

I’m starting a new project and I’m having trouble deciding between using Alpine JS or the Interactivity API with Tailwind CSS.

As I understand, Alpine JS might make implementing animations easier, but the Interactivity APl is the official solution.

Is there easy way to use animation with Interactivity APl like Alpine JS?
